As many of you know, I spent nearly a dozen years
covering the accounting profession.
During that span I met and engaged with a number of the
profession’s most influential – occasionally in an adversarial capacity, but
far more frequently in a tabula rasa
mode – siphoning all the experience and knowledge of others to my rather blank mental
slate in the accounting arena. There are those to whom I’ll be forever grateful
for their patience and understanding and who helped guide me through a sector that
even today, I still find myself in a learning mode.
And then there was Professor Abraham Briloff, who quietly
passed away last week at the age of 96.
In the circles I currently travel in – i.e. succession
and M&A, his name might not trigger instant recognition, as his teachings
and writings centered more on the integrity – and at times lack thereof – of
the profession and an often scathing criticism of corporate finance and the
questionable accounting maneuvers that were often deployed on company balance
sheets.
Despite his slight frame and a height that may have been
a toothpick or two over 5-feet, he fearlessly went toe-to-toe against such
titans as Waste Management and Google, dissecting their financial statements
and spotlighting irregularities that somehow had passed muster with their
auditors.
And, oh yes, he was legally blind and had his daughter,
who was also a CPA, read the statements to him.
His writing pedigree was established long before he
became a semi-regular columnist for me, in such august publications as Barron’s
and later authored four books on accounting, including his
first in 1967, “The Effectiveness of Accounting Communication,” which was based
on his doctoral dissertation.
His story was typical of his generation.
His parents were Russian immigrants – his father a
butcher and his mother a seamstress. He, as many in the profession did,
graduated from City College of New York with an accounting degree. In between,
he taught night classes on bookkeeping and stenography and reviewed and
prepared tax returns for a midsized firm before starting his own practice in
1951.
We would meet once a month for lunch at his favorite
German restaurant where like a true accountant; he would never veer from his
favorite – potato pancakes accompanied by a glass of Chardonnay. Afterward, we
would take walks around Gramercy Park, him holding my arm for guidance, but all
the while waxing eloquently and often despondently, about where the profession
was headed particularly during the accounting scandals of a decade ago.
When he wanted to make a point, he would employ both your
first and last name, like “Bill Carlino, why is it that many accounting firms
have seemingly abandoned common sense?” I would just listen and hopefully, through
osmosis or otherwise, gain some of the insight he offered free of charge from his
seven decades in the profession.
And unlike an accountant he never once let me pick up the
check. He always told me this was his way of returning the favor for publishing
his opinions.
I never got the chance to tell him that it was far more
the other way around.
No comments:
Post a Comment