Ever hear of not-so-uncommon scenario where a married
couple approaches a milestone anniversary and one spouse surprises the other
with a celebratory exotic vacation, only to have the other serve them with
divorce papers?
A case of bad timing probably doesn’t get much worse than
that. In the history of understatements that’s what I would consider two fairly
divergent views on the health of a relationship. Fortunately, on my recent 25th
wedding anniversary there was no process server banging on my door.
In our line of work, it would be an incredible
oversimplification to state the importance of everyone being on the same page.
Meetings between buyers and sellers should generally end with similar feelings
from both parties – that of whether to proceed full steam ahead or simply wish
each other luck going forward.
Conversely, it’s also incredibly easy to unknowingly send
the wrong message at the worst time – even if things appear rosy between firms
in negotiations.
Case in point: Following a recent meeting between two
East Coast firms, both felt that the talks had the potential to lead to
something more permanent.
But then the specter of tax season reared its ugly head.
The seller wanted to arrange an informal second meeting,
perhaps in a restaurant, a get together that would lasted an hour at most.
Incredibly, the potential successor firm RSVP’d “no” –
the reason being that with tax season encroaching the partners could not spare
an hour.
And yes, you read that right. Sixty minutes was an impossible
slot to carve out.
I told the managing partner of the potential successor
practice that the rejection sent two messages to the seller firm and neither of
them was good.
First, it indicated that his firm was so busy it would give
the seller firm reason to pause and wonder if they had to capacity to
efficiently absorb him. Second, declining the sit down inferred that the seller
firm was not a priority.
So I asked the principal point blank, which message did
he want me to relay to the seller?
He admitted that he understood my point, but remained
steadfast in sticking to his tax-season schedule and to put an exclamation
point on this episode, he even requested that the seller not even CALL him from
February to the end of April.
Now, having covered the profession for a dozen years, I
know busy season can drain a firm and its staff like no other time of the year.
But it can also mean lost opportunities for firms so regimented in their ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment