Ray Kroc, a one-time milkshake machine salesman from
Chicago who took a flyer on a small burger operation in San Bernardino, Calif.,
operated by two brothers named McDonald and transformed it into one of the
largest global brands in history, harbored an immovable theory on assembling a
management team.
Long before the overused term “diversity” made its way
into the American lexicon, Kroc was steadfast in his opinion of having
different views on strategies and operations.
“If I have two executives who think alike, I don’t need
one of them,” he would succinctly utter.
And considering the 60-year growth and success of the
world’s largest hamburger chain, it’s rather pointless to argue with Kroc’s
management mantra.
You don’t have to be business and achievement gurus on
the order of Stephen Covey or Jim Collins to realize that whether it’s the
management team, shareholders or the rank and file employees – more often than
not the end results are better when different voices are taken into account.
Now the accounting profession has rarely been a
trailblazer in many areas – in fact, it’s historically lagged behind the legal
and medical professions in such areas as technology and brand promotion to name
two.
And its advances
in the recruiting and retaining of minorities have been moving at a somewhat
glacial pace.
But consider this: if you gathered 20 CPAs from 20
different firms in a room and challenged them with a problem – I would venture
to guess you’d get more than one opinion on its solution.
Perhaps more firms need to challenge the status quo and
throw a brick or two at the conventional thought matrix.
I’m dating myself but I remember the 1968 Olympics in
Mexico City. For generations, the tried and true method of performing the high
jump was the traditional “scissor kick” (the lead leg over the bar first and
then the trail leg.) However, along came a competitor from the U.S. – Richard
Fosbury, who, to the amazement of everyone, performed the jump with his back to
the bar and flopped over – back first- a technique that became known as the
Fosbury Flop and revolutionized the event.
Now imagine what could happen to say a firm’s strategy on
growth or improved realization rates were examined from myriad perspectives.
Undoubtedly you would receive some atypical feedback.
Ray Kroc recognized the benefits to this way of thinking
more than a half-century ago – but for the profession, it’s better late than
never.
No comments:
Post a Comment