There’s an old story which tells of a youngster who
sported a pretty decent pitching arm for his age and in sandlot games he
regularly struck out the side.
More often than not his team won.
One day he came home obviously moping when his mother
asked what was wrong.
He replied sheepishly – “I had a no hitter going until
the big kids came home from school.”
I’m sure a lot of us have felt that way at one time or
another – in an athletic contest or otherwise.
The same “bigger is better” logic could also be applied
to CPA firms.
With quantum changes pending in the marketplace - particularly
in technologies such as AI, blockchain and robotics which threaten to automate
much of the Type 1 work – the smaller
firms may soon find themselves unable to compete with their larger counterparts
in terms of resources, platform of
services and perhaps most of all – human capital.
This is not your father’s accounting firm, but it never
ceases to amaze me how many firm owners still adhere to that antiquated
strategy. You can run a firm in 2019 like you did in 1985 and those that do
face a Sisyphean task in attempting to do so. The results are obvious – lost
clients, no succession plan and an inability to mine new business.
So, as things go farther and farther south those firms
often find themselves at an unpleasant crossroads – scramble to find a merger
partner or soap the windows and padlock the door.
Conversely, they could proactively consider moving
upstream and join forces with a larger firm – thereby “going big” in colloquial
terms where they would avail themselves of the resources and niches that they
currently can’t offer their clients.
Trouble is, too many owners are of the mindset that
merging up is akin to a battlefield surrender whereas nothing could be further
from the truth. In quick order following an upstream affiliation they would
expose their clients to an expanded roster of services, free themselves from
the burden of administration therefore allowing themselves to pursue new
business development.
During our CPE courses we have a saying that “bigger
isn’t necessarily better – better is better.”
And in many cases, that’s certainly true. But if you want
to keep the no hitter going into the later innings it may be time to yield to
another adage – “if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em.
No comments:
Post a Comment