Next week I am scheduled to jet off to the Mile-High City
of Denver where I will deliver a couple of presentations on succession planning
at a global software vendors massive user’s conference.
I was flattered when they accepted my speaking proposal
but harkened back to when we would regularly exhibit at this event complete
with a booth and marketing materials and generate little or no interest from
attendees. We collectively figured we were simply catering to the wrong
audience.
Perhaps this year will be different.
As evidence, I have already received several emails from
attendees who claim they are looking forward to my presentation. I was both
flattered and puzzled. Just a few short years ago I taught a similar session at
this same event some five years ago and the audience more resembled a haunted
house in number than a standing room only crowd.
So, what has changed?
I would like to think they many have finally resigned
themselves to the fact that they can no longer ignore the elephant – or perhaps
closer to the scale of the problem – the wooly mammoth – in the room –
succession planning or lack thereof.
Mark Twain once remarked that no amount of evidence will
ever persuade an idiot. I’ll be somewhat more diplomatic and tell anyone that
will listen there is a virtual Mount Everest of statistical and real-life
evidence that the profession is dangerously behind on succession planning.
Yet most firm owners prefer kicking the can down the road
and putting the inevitable off for yet another year.
Case in point. Last year I was working with a sole
practitioner in the Northeast who was approaching the dreaded six-five. His
practice generated roughly $1 million in billings and made an easy “tuck-in”
for larger firms.
Yet, he decided to spurn any offer and opted for the “P”
word – procrastination.
Let me tell you what happened in the course of several
months. His IT system went on the fritz – requiring an expensive upgrade. One
of his key employees resigned and he suffered the loss of a 50K client that he
never saw coming.
Now he’s forced to accept far less profitable terms
should he finally make the decision to merge.
I should use that as a marquee case study during the
conference on the importance of succession planning and see who salutes or at
least pays attention.
I don’t know how much has changed in five years, but
that’s the skeptic in me talking.
We’ll see.
No comments:
Post a Comment