Last week I was speaking with one of our clients in the
New England region who was in the market to acquire a “tuck-in” practice – an
industry term for a practice that can literally be tucked in to an existing firm
without taking additional space.
And as luck would have it, a seller firm fitting his wish
list description had come across my desk just the week before.
It was a two-partner firm within reasonable commuting
distance, generating just over $1 million in revenue with each owner looking to
slow down between three and five years.
On paper it looked to be what we proverbially refer to as
the “round peg in the round hole.”
So when I attempted to arrange a meeting, the owner of
the buyer firm said that he could only entertain meetings after the 10-15
deadline because he was “knee deep” (his term not mine) in returns.
On a scale of 1-10 with one being the worst, this was a
response that at its most generous rated a 3.
Why?