Welcome back and belated Happy New Year.
Here’s hoping you all enjoyed your holiday and now you
have a month or so to not only prepare for another filing season, but digest
all the new tax law changes so you can explain in layman’s terms to your
clients what it means for them.
Believe it or not, in the midst of all this we still have
a number of M&A deals awaiting closure. It sounds grossly counter-intuitive
but just prior to tax season is sometimes the best time of the year to
facilitate a merger. If you’re a seller firm it’s the one time of the year you
see virtually all your clients in person and when you need all the resources
you can muster.
Hence, it’s often a perfect time to set the wheels in
motion for an efficient transition.
Unless of course you decide to move the proverbial goal
posts.
And what I mean by that is to suddenly begin expanding
your list of “must haves” prior to entertaining any merger meetings or
discussions.
Case in point.
Recently we took on a sole practitioner in the New York
area generating just over $1 million in billings and looking to reduce his
workload. OK, sounded easy enough. We have plenty of buyer clients who would at
least look at that opportunity so we began the traditional process of writing
up a practice summary sheet and sending it out to see who bites.
So after the selection process the meetings commenced. The first sign of trouble was when he balked at one potential successor’s
office view. Suddenly he demanded to have a scenic panorama. After meeting
another potential suitor, he complained that their offices were not within
walking distance to his commuter railroad. That was a deal-breaker according to
him. I said this is the first I’m hearing about it. To which he responded, “You
should know my parameters.”
I quickly responded “not if you don’t tell me.”
Finally, after a third meeting, he said that the offices of
that particular practice had only one conference room and he needed more than
that to meet all the clients that come in personally. I asked him how he could
be in two rooms at one time, but apparently the question and practicality eluded
him.
I told him in no uncertain terms that after tax season we
would have a “wake up and face north” discussion about what was realistic and
what is not. And if he continued to upgrade his demands on the spur of the
moment, he is free to look elsewhere for counsel.
At the very least, he’ll have three grueling months to
think about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment