In full
disclosure, I enjoy eating out – period. I can say with some assurance that the
rare times my spouse and I agree to “stay in tonight” will be pretty much a
thing of the past once this pandemic quarantine eases.
But on the
other hand, I have no desire to go to a restaurant, have my temperature taken
and remove my mask every time I sample my appetizer or entrée, would not be my
idea of a relaxing night out.
But as someone
who has worked in the restaurant industry and later covered it for 12 years, I
have a kindred sympathy for both the owners and employees affected – some
permanently by this crisis. It pains me to see once thriving establishments
functioning with a skeleton crew to compile take-out only orders or in a
worst-case scenario, boarded up for good.
The other day
I read an interview with the chef/owner of one of New York’s top seafood
restaurants, who lamented that even when they are given the green light to
reopen, he would have to maintain social distancing restraints, which
essentially means reducing the number of tables. So, with his fixed costs,
including the stratospheric rents commanded by Manhattan landlords, coupled
with the platinum prices of having exotic fish flown in daily, he doesn’t see
how his establishment can come within three area codes of turning a profit with
a diminished customer count.
But the
industry may have another problem – this one of unintended consequences. Many
operators have given their employees the option of being let go as to be able
to collect unemployment.
Ok, that’s
more than fair – but this example of altruism presents a conundrum in the fact
that with the addition of the CARES Act, and the extra $600 supplied by the
states, a good portion of restaurant line workers and assorted staff are
actually making more money by not working and collecting unemployment checks.
And restaurants
may not be the only retail vertical facing what is certain to be an inevitable headache.
In a real-time
example, a former colleague of mine who was a victim of COVID-19 downsizing is
now clearing well over $4,000 a month! The one time I was entitled to collect
unemployment I received a weekly check of exactly $400.
Now in his
early 60's he admitted that he was not exactly planning to elbow his way back to
work. And in truth I can’t say that I blame him.
But back to
the situation at hand.
My spouse and
I are battling over which cuisine to order on our one designated night off from
behind the stoves. I want Indian, she’s leaning toward Thai. Maybe we’ll
compromise and get Chinese.
May that be
ours and others’ biggest problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment