I’m sure most of you can harken back to some of your past jobs and dredge up examples of management decisions that defied analysis. Like bad managers, I am confident there is no shortage of strategic moves that would befuddle a middle schooler.
As
an example, I once worked for a restaurant chain that specialized in exotic crepes.
Many of you along the East Coast and in San Francisco may have an idea what
company I’m referring to. Most of the company’s units were in shopping malls
and obviously were mandated to adhere to the opening and closing hours of said
malls.
The
exception being a certain New Jersey county, which prohibited malls from remaining
open on Sundays. Now, with no shoppers allowed in the mall, it would stand to
reason that the restaurant would be closed as well. Nope. The company ordered
them to remain open and as customer counts resembled a haunted house, it
inexplicably held steadfast its imbecilic decision.
I
even wrote to the company headquarters questioning the futility of remaining
open, only to be dressed down by my manager for having the temerity to contact
corporate.
Not
long afterwards the company shuttered many of its stores and the concept was
passed from one buyer to another and today, just a few remain in select
airports.
Fast forward a few years later when I was employed at a publishing house, which was steadily witnessing a decline in revenues. After a consultant was brought in to assess the problem, it was determined that the company had more vice presidents in its ranks than salespeople. This egregious strategy was implemented in a company that depended on ad sales for its survival.
The
company president’s solution? – he hired yet another vice president and placed
him in charge of revenue growth. I will leave it to your respective imaginations
as to how that worked out.
Apparently,
that company was not alone in its belief that increasing the number of C-suite
executives would solve revenue problems. In my previous post prior to my
current position, the publishing house I worked for exercised a semi-annual
ritual of employee layoffs – in December and in August. They would terminate
workers averaging $50K a year and then turn around and stuff its management
ranks with additional executives - many earning more than 300K a year. That helped
transform a company which once boasted more than 400 employees to one that
numbers just over 100 today. And when I again questioned that strategy I was
not only rewarded with a murderous glare from the CEO, but two weeks later, I
suddenly found myself micromanaged by a duo of newly assigned supervisors.
And
I could go on regaling you with buffoonish managerial vignettes.
I
guess the point of all this is that just because someone holds the title of
manager or perhaps even a higher assignation, do not assume that they are the
next Peter Drucker or James Collins.
Like
they warned after 9-11, “if you see something, say something.” If it results in
a blowback, then it should be relatively easy to determine you should begin
looking for employment elsewhere.
I
did and unlike many decisions I’ve witnessed, have never questioned it.
No comments:
Post a Comment